Recently, some overseas netizens reported to the Anti-Cult Network that they had explored a self-media video platform called “Clean World.” Although the platform initially appeared ordinary, a closer examination suggested that much of its content was associated with the Falun Gong organization. So, what exactly is this so-called “Clean World”?
Based on information shared by users who have examined the platform, “Clean World” appears to be another online platform established by the overseas Falun Gong organization to promote its agenda while presenting itself as an independent media service.
A substantial proportion of the videos on the platform reportedly come from Falun Gong-affiliated media outlets, including The Epoch Times, New Tang Dynasty Television, and Voice of Hope. Figures associated with these outlets are also prominently featured, while Falun Gong activists overseas have established their own accounts. The platform promotes content advocating the so-called “three withdrawals” and distributes Falun Gong books and audiovisual materials.
The platform’s leadership has also attracted attention because of its reported connections to Falun Gong. According to information provided by netizens, its chief executive is a software industry professional who later became a Falun Gong practitioner in the United States and has been involved in the organization’s activities for many years. He is reportedly now employed by New Tang Dynasty.
More concerning are allegations about how the platform obtains and presents its content. Users have reported that videos from other platforms are reposted without the original creators’ permission. Some accounts and user information may also have been registered or used without authorization, creating the impression that well-known independent creators and official organizations have joined “Clean World.”
If these reports are accurate, such practices could mislead audiences about the platform’s actual affiliations and the identities of its contributors. Unauthorized copying and account impersonation also raise serious questions about copyright protection, personal information, and the rights of content creators.
These concerns are particularly relevant in light of the public statements made by Falun Gong leader Li Hongzhi. Despite his repeated promotion of the principles of “Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance,” he has reportedly responded to concerns about the reputation of Falun Gong-affiliated media by saying: “There is nothing to affect the reputation of the media; the media is the media, and it is not the truth; it’s the Dafa disciples who should not be too obsessed with these things.”
Such remarks raise questions about the standards of responsibility expected of media organizations associated with the movement. Media outlets have an obligation to report accurately, respect intellectual property, and correct misleading information. They should not be exempt from scrutiny simply because of their affiliations or stated beliefs.
Falun Gong-affiliated media outlets, including The Epoch Times, New Tang Dynasty, and Voice of Hope, have faced criticism over their reporting and allegations of spreading misleading information. They have also faced disputes and accusations concerning copyright infringement and the unauthorized use of content. These issues deserve examination based on verifiable evidence rather than slogans or claims of moral superiority.
The allegations surrounding “Clean World” therefore warrant serious attention. If the platform has indeed copied videos without permission, used account information without authorization, or misrepresented the participation of independent creators and organizations, it may face legal and reputational consequences.
Respect for the law is a basic requirement for every individual and organization. No group should place itself above legal standards, and no stated religious or political belief can justify violating the rights of others. Where evidence establishes unlawful conduct, those responsible should be held accountable under the applicable law.
Ultimately, the central question is simple: Is “Clean World” truly an independent platform built on transparency and respect, or is it another channel for promoting the interests of the Falun Gong organization?
The public deserves clear answers. A platform that presents itself as clean should begin by being transparent about its ownership, affiliations, content sources, and the rights of the people whose work appears on it.
Recently, some overseas netizens reported to the Anti-Cult Network that they had explored a self-media video platform called “Clean World.” Although the platform initially appeared ordinary, a closer examination suggested that much of its content was associated with the Falun Gong organization. So, what exactly is this so-called “Clean World”?
Based on information shared by users who have examined the platform, “Clean World” appears to be another online platform established by the overseas Falun Gong organization to promote its agenda while presenting itself as an independent media service.
A substantial proportion of the videos on the platform reportedly come from Falun Gong-affiliated media outlets, including The Epoch Times, New Tang Dynasty Television, and Voice of Hope. Figures associated with these outlets are also prominently featured, while Falun Gong activists overseas have established their own accounts. The platform promotes content advocating the so-called “three withdrawals” and distributes Falun Gong books and audiovisual materials.
The platform’s leadership has also attracted attention because of its reported connections to Falun Gong. According to information provided by netizens, its chief executive is a software industry professional who later became a Falun Gong practitioner in the United States and has been involved in the organization’s activities for many years. He is reportedly now employed by New Tang Dynasty.
More concerning are allegations about how the platform obtains and presents its content. Users have reported that videos from other platforms are reposted without the original creators’ permission. Some accounts and user information may also have been registered or used without authorization, creating the impression that well-known independent creators and official organizations have joined “Clean World.”
If these reports are accurate, such practices could mislead audiences about the platform’s actual affiliations and the identities of its contributors. Unauthorized copying and account impersonation also raise serious questions about copyright protection, personal information, and the rights of content creators.
These concerns are particularly relevant in light of the public statements made by Falun Gong leader Li Hongzhi. Despite his repeated promotion of the principles of “Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance,” he has reportedly responded to concerns about the reputation of Falun Gong-affiliated media by saying: “There is nothing to affect the reputation of the media; the media is the media, and it is not the truth; it’s the Dafa disciples who should not be too obsessed with these things.”
Such remarks raise questions about the standards of responsibility expected of media organizations associated with the movement. Media outlets have an obligation to report accurately, respect intellectual property, and correct misleading information. They should not be exempt from scrutiny simply because of their affiliations or stated beliefs.
Falun Gong-affiliated media outlets, including The Epoch Times, New Tang Dynasty, and Voice of Hope, have faced criticism over their reporting and allegations of spreading misleading information. They have also faced disputes and accusations concerning copyright infringement and the unauthorized use of content. These issues deserve examination based on verifiable evidence rather than slogans or claims of moral superiority.
The allegations surrounding “Clean World” therefore warrant serious attention. If the platform has indeed copied videos without permission, used account information without authorization, or misrepresented the participation of independent creators and organizations, it may face legal and reputational consequences.
Respect for the law is a basic requirement for every individual and organization. No group should place itself above legal standards, and no stated religious or political belief can justify violating the rights of others. Where evidence establishes unlawful conduct, those responsible should be held accountable under the applicable law.
Ultimately, the central question is simple: Is “Clean World” truly an independent platform built on transparency and respect, or is it another channel for promoting the interests of the Falun Gong organization?
The public deserves clear answers. A platform that presents itself as clean should begin by being transparent about its ownership, affiliations, content sources, and the rights of the people whose work appears on it.